The Law of One, Book I, Session 12
Questioner: Are most of these crusaders fourth-density?
Ra: I am Ra. There is a majority of fourth-density.
That is correct.
Questioner: Is an entity in the fourth density normally invisible to us?
Ra: I am Ra. The use of the word “normal” is one which befuddles the meaning of the question.
Let us rephrase for clarity.
The fourth density is, by choice, not visible to third density.
It is possible for fourth density to be visible.
However, it is not the choice of the fourth-density entity to be visible due to the necessity for concentration upon a rather difficult vibrational complex which is the third density you experience.
Questioner: Are there any Confederation or Orion entities living upon the Earth and operating visibly among us in our society at this time?
Ra: I am Ra. There are no entities of either group walking among you at this time.
However, the crusaders of Orion use two types of entities to do their bidding, shall we say.
The first type
is the thought-form;
a kind of robot.
Questioner: Could you describe the robot?
Ra: I am Ra. The robot may look like any other being.
It is a construct.
Questioner: Is the robot what is normally called the “Men in Black”?
Ra: I am Ra. This is incorrect.
Questioner: Who are the Men in Black?
Ra: I am Ra. The Men in Black are a thought-form type of entity which have some beingness to their make-up.
They have certain physical characteristics given them.
However, their true vibrational nature is without third-density vibrational characteristics and, therefore, they are able to materialize and dematerialize when necessary.
Questioner: Are all of these Men in Black then used by the Orion crusaders?
Ra: I am Ra. This is correct.
Questioner: If an Man In Black were to visit me and I locked him in the closet could I keep him, or would he disappear?
Ra: I am Ra. It depends upon which type of entity you grab.
You are perhaps able to perceive a construct.
The construct might be kept for a brief period, although these constructs also have an ability to disappear.
The programming on these constructs, however, makes it more difficult to remotely control them.
You would not be able to grapple with a thought-form entity of the Man in Black, as you call it, type.
Questioner: Would this be against the Law of One?
Would I be making a mistake by grabbing one of those entities?
Ra: I am Ra. There are no mistakes under the Law of One.
Questioner: What I mean to ask is would I be polarizing more towards self-service or service to others when I did this act of locking up the thought-form or construct?
Ra: I am Ra. You may consider that question for yourself.
We interpret the Law of One, but not to the extent of advice.